2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock physics modelling of porous rocks with multiple pore types: a multiple‐porosity variable critical porosity model

Abstract: A B S T R A C TA critical porosity model establishes the empirical relationship between a grain matrix and a dry rock by the concept of critical porosity. The model is simple and practical and widely used. But the critical porosity in the model is a fixed value that cannot relate to pore structure. The aim of this paper is to establish the theoretical relationship between critical porosity and pore structure by combining Kuster-Toksöz theory with the critical porosity model. Different from the traditional crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more obvious the amplitude difference, the better the oil content. [47][48][49] As shown in Well F854, the resistivity in the 1808~1810m section is 13.4Ω•m, and the oil test conclusion is that the oil layer has a daily oil production of 3.74t and water production of 0.66m 3 .…”
Section: A Spontaneous Potential (Sp)overlapmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The more obvious the amplitude difference, the better the oil content. [47][48][49] As shown in Well F854, the resistivity in the 1808~1810m section is 13.4Ω•m, and the oil test conclusion is that the oil layer has a daily oil production of 3.74t and water production of 0.66m 3 .…”
Section: A Spontaneous Potential (Sp)overlapmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The corresponding scattering velocity-porosity relationships were then reasonably interpreted by varied crack concentrations. Further, the sophisticated double-porosity model [10,11] and the multiple-porosity model [12] were proposed to explain tight sandstone's poroelastic behaviors accurately. Experimental investigations confirmed the applicability of the double-porosity model for tight sandstones [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proven that this method can effectively solve the problem of S-wave velocity prediction in the area lacking S-wave logging data (Zhu et al, 2017). Zhang et al (2019) and Zhang et al (2020a) pointed out that the reservoir can be better described based on the rock physical modeling of two-phase media, and the concept of critical porosity can also be used to establish the empirical relationship between the grain matrix and dry rock, providing parameters for fluid identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%