All Days 2012
DOI: 10.2118/159991-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock Classification in Carbonate Reservoirs Based on Static and Dynamic Petrophysical Properties Estimated from Conventional Well Logs

Abstract: Rock typing in carbonate reservoirs is challenging due to high spatial heterogeneity and complex pore structure. In extreme cases, conventional rock typing methods such as Leverett's J-function, Winland's R 35 , and flow zone indicator are inadequate to capture the heterogeneity and complexity of carbonate petrofacies. Furthermore, these methods are based on core measurements, hence are not applicable to uncored reservoir zones. This paper introduces a new method for petrophysical rock classification in carbon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration of rock facies classification into the formation permeability modeling, especially given the core measurement and well log interpretations, is a crucial step to reduce the uncertainty in reservoir characterization (Xu et al 2012). Rock facies classification leads to improve the relationship between permeability and porosity and then results in efficiently estimating the petrophysical properties in noncored intervals (Lee and Datta-Gupta 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of rock facies classification into the formation permeability modeling, especially given the core measurement and well log interpretations, is a crucial step to reduce the uncertainty in reservoir characterization (Xu et al 2012). Rock facies classification leads to improve the relationship between permeability and porosity and then results in efficiently estimating the petrophysical properties in noncored intervals (Lee and Datta-Gupta 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of rock-typing methods has been proposed for carbonate reservoirs (e.g. Lucia 1999;Gomes et al 2008;Hollis et al 2010;Xu et al 2012;Kazemi et al 2012;van der Land et al 2013;Chandra et al 2014;Skalinski & Kenter 2014). However, these methods are commonly more oriented towards practical industry workflows, such as defining empirical porositypermeability transforms that translate porosities measured at the wireline scale to permeability values in reservoir models.…”
Section: Fundamental Controls On Fluid Flow In Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of workflows exist that aim to define rock types with unique hydraulic properties for carbonate reservoirs (e.g. Lucia 1999; Gomes et al 2008;Hollis et al 2010;Xu et al 2012;Kazemi et al 2012). However, as mentioned before, these workflows are not based on first principles.…”
Section: Selected Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the well includes routine core measurements. Due to low reservoir pressure, deep mud-filtrate invasion affects the nuclear logs and even the deep resistivity log, such that log-derived S hc is considerably lower than in-situ S hc for water-base mud (Xu et al, 2012). Table 5.3…”
Section: Field Example I Gas-bearing Carbonatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior can be attributed to variations in Archie's parameters for differing rock types along the well. Furthermore, S w in core samples could increase due to quick spurt loss in low porosity, low pressure reservoirs (Xu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Field Example I Gas-bearing Carbonatementioning
confidence: 99%