2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROCK- and Myosin-Dependent Matrix Deformation Enables Protease-Independent Tumor-Cell Invasion In Vivo

Abstract: Tumor cells invading three-dimensional matrices need to remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) in their path. Many studies have focused on the role of extracellular proteases; however, cells with amoeboid or rounded morphologies are able to invade even when these enzymes are inhibited. Here, we describe the mechanism by which cells move through a dense ECM without proteolysis. Amoeboid tumor cells generate sufficient actomyosin force to deform collagen fibers and are able to push through the ECM. Force generat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
421
4
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(457 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
24
421
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Migrating cells exert traction force upon their surroundings, 26,27 and cell traction force is necessary in cancer cell migration and invasion. 28,29 Fourier transform traction microscopy showed that stably LAMC2-transfected A549R0 cells were bigger in size (Po0.05) and exhibited greater cell traction force (Figure 2e), with~1.5-fold higher (Po0.05) net contractile moment compared with mock control. Similar results were observed in A549R3-Brain and A549R4-Femur cells as compared with A549R0 cells (Supplementary Figure S2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrating cells exert traction force upon their surroundings, 26,27 and cell traction force is necessary in cancer cell migration and invasion. 28,29 Fourier transform traction microscopy showed that stably LAMC2-transfected A549R0 cells were bigger in size (Po0.05) and exhibited greater cell traction force (Figure 2e), with~1.5-fold higher (Po0.05) net contractile moment compared with mock control. Similar results were observed in A549R3-Brain and A549R4-Femur cells as compared with A549R0 cells (Supplementary Figure S2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the critical role of actomyosin contractility in amoeboid migration (Wyckoff et al, 2006), together with the fact that Tm5NM1 causes increased myosin II activity (Bryce et al, 2003), it is surprising that Tm5NM1 does not cause cells to transit to an amoeboid phenotype. Importantly, amoeboid motility is highly dependant on extensive reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton (Eichinger et al, 1999;Sahai, 2007;Kitzing et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protease inhibitor (PI) cocktail contained E-64 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), Pepstatin A (Sigma), Leupeptin (Sigma), Aprotinin (Sigma) and Marimastat (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO, USA); concentrations used were those previously described to induce mesenchymal to amoeboid migration . The Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 (Sigma) was used at 10 mM, a concentration previously described to inhibit Rho kinase activity (Wyckoff et al, 2006). Sheep polyclonal anti-g/9d antibody was used to detect exon 9D containing tropomyosins isoforms (Tm5NM1/2), and mouse anti-a/9d antibody was used to detect Tms 1, 2, 3, 5a and 5b as previously described .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesenchymal motility is dependent on integrins and proteases, such as MMPs (matrix metalloproteinases), whereas amoeboid motility is dependent on the ROCK/Rho kinase. The latter phosphorylates the myosin-II light chain and consequently leads to actomyosin contractility, and this process that is independent of protease activity Sabeh et al, 2004;Wilkinson et al, 2005;Carragher et al, 2006;Paluch et al, 2006;Torka et al, 2006;Wyckoff et al, 2006;Sahai et al, 2007;Fackler and Grosse, 2008). Mesenchymal motility can also switch to amoeboid motility if pericellular proteolysis is blocked by treatment with protease inhibitors (Wolf et al, , 2007Carragher et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%