2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10766-015-0384-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rochester Elastic Cache Utility (RECU): Unequal Cache Sharing is Good Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible solution extends EMBA to be QoS-aware, such that the performance of any individual program is guaranteed to be not less than certain percentage of the baseline, for example, when the performance is measured in bandwidth, 20% QoS means the bandwidth reduction of any individual program in an application mix should not exceed 20% of its bandwidth in baseline. A similar QoS metric was used by Ye et al [39] for cache partition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution extends EMBA to be QoS-aware, such that the performance of any individual program is guaranteed to be not less than certain percentage of the baseline, for example, when the performance is measured in bandwidth, 20% QoS means the bandwidth reduction of any individual program in an application mix should not exceed 20% of its bandwidth in baseline. A similar QoS metric was used by Ye et al [39] for cache partition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If fairness is a concern, then we can amend the cost function to discard an unfair scheme and optimize the performance under the fairness constraint. A recent solution is the baseline optimization by Brock et al [24] and Ye et al [52].…”
Section: Algorithm 3: Dynamic Programming For Penalty Class Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing datasets include weakly increasing valuation functions that might not be concave. This is our main test case as real-life valuation functions may have multiple inflection points [11,20,39,56,60,62]. Valuation functions, however, are not expected to decrease when more resources are offered, if these resources can be freely discarded.…”
Section: Benchmark Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others solve the problem for a single resource when only one function is not concave but is monotonically increasing [9]. Concave valuation functions are an unrealistic requirement for cloud clients as their valuation functions have multiple inflection points [11,20,39,56,60,62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%