2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.103.012602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of topological defects in discrete domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a), we identify AE1/2 defects via discrete contour integral of the director field. 32,33 By tracking their trajectories (marked by light green and purple lines) and symmetry axes (marked by dark green and purple lines), we obtain the distributions of the magnitude of defects' translational (V) and rotational (O) velocities as shown in panel (b). We find that, in contrast to the fast streaming behaviors in wet systems, here the +1/2-order defect moves as slowly as the À1/2order defect, with the most probable speed only about 0.3 (the single rod moving speed is 1).…”
Section: Bd Particle Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a), we identify AE1/2 defects via discrete contour integral of the director field. 32,33 By tracking their trajectories (marked by light green and purple lines) and symmetry axes (marked by dark green and purple lines), we obtain the distributions of the magnitude of defects' translational (V) and rotational (O) velocities as shown in panel (b). We find that, in contrast to the fast streaming behaviors in wet systems, here the +1/2-order defect moves as slowly as the À1/2order defect, with the most probable speed only about 0.3 (the single rod moving speed is 1).…”
Section: Bd Particle Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each detected cluster, we determine the center of mass (x clust , y clust ) of all defect locations (unit weights) in that cluster. We use discretized circular paths around the center point to compute the total topological charge, robustness [3,4], and the total number of microscopic defects enclosed by increasing path radii r ∈ (0, ∞). We find that paths smaller than the inner core radius R 1 lead to erratically fluctuating index estimates of low robustness (Fig.…”
Section: Defect Cores and Their Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we find the core radius estimator to work reliably in our benchmarks, other heuristics are possible as well. For example, one could alternatively fit a piecewise constant function to identify the onset of the robustness plateau at the core size radius, or employ a magnitude-aware version of the robustness measure [3]. One could also include information about the total number of enclosed microscopic defects, which also plateaus beyond the core radius (Fig.…”
Section: Defect Cores and Their Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations