1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9965.00047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of the Black and Scholes Formula

Abstract: Consider an option on a stock whose volatility is unknown and stochastic. An agent assumes this volatility to be a specific function of time and the stock price, knowing that this assumption may result in a misspecification of the volatility. However, if the misspecified volatility dominates the true volatility, then the misspecified price of the option dominates its true price. Moreover, the option hedging strategy computed under the assumption of the misspecified volatility provides an almost sure one-sided … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
247
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
247
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that in a complete market setup, the loss process corresponds to the tracking error of [15].…”
Section: Proposition 1 1 the Total Expected Loss From Replicating Undermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that in a complete market setup, the loss process corresponds to the tracking error of [15].…”
Section: Proposition 1 1 the Total Expected Loss From Replicating Undermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of feedback effects, Black-Scholes strategies based on the assumption of a constant volatility produce a tracking error that is almost surely non-zero. El Karoui et al (1998) show how to derive a formula for the tracking error, which measures the difference between the actual and the theoretical value of a self-financing hedge portfolio for a European call calculated from the Black-Scholes formula with constant volatility. Proposition 2 gives us an insight about the behaviour of the tracking error: clearly, for rðc; =Þ sufficiently small, as required in Proposition 2, the tracking error vanishes.…”
Section: Elettra Agliardi and Rainer Andergassen (Ss)-adjustment Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already outlined in [1], [9], [17] and [20], natural candidates to be respectively superreplication capital and a Markov superstrategy in this context are…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This payoff can be used as a lower bound for options on the sum of 2 assets (see [9] for details). We suppose that we superhedge this option using a model in which Σ is as in Example 12.…”
Section: An Example Of Non-convex Payoffmentioning
confidence: 99%