2012
DOI: 10.3103/s0027132212030059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of sign tests in autoregression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their simplicity, the sign tests do extremely well (confirming univariate robustness results by Boldin (2012Boldin ( , 2013) but remain less powerful than the bias-corrected vdW tests.…”
Section: Numerical Results: Size Power and Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Despite their simplicity, the sign tests do extremely well (confirming univariate robustness results by Boldin (2012Boldin ( , 2013) but remain less powerful than the bias-corrected vdW tests.…”
Section: Numerical Results: Size Power and Bias Correctionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other reviews: H-Net https://networks.h-net.org/node/1883/pages/144668/new-book-struggle-save-soviet-economy-mikhailgorbachev-and-collapse [2] Source URL: https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/2066 Links [1] https://reviews.history.ac.uk/item/252204 [2] https://networks.h-net.org/node/1883/pages/144668/new-book-struggle-save-soviet-economy-mikhailgorbachev-and-collapse…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%