2019
DOI: 10.1111/poms.12944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of Resource Recovery Systems under Feedstock Uncertainty

Abstract: Recovery of resources from waste streams present important opportunities in mitigating environmental and energy challenges in many countries. In this paper, we develop an optimization‐based approach to study the robustness of resource recovery systems in achieving economic feasibility under feedstock uncertainty. Two key characteristics of the feedstock that influence recovery performance are its volume and composition. We propose models of feedstock robustness functions to perform robustness analysis with res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the above studies, Xiong et al. (2017) and Wang and Ng (2018) are the most related to our current work. The difference and research gap are explained as follows: (i) Although Xiong et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among the above studies, Xiong et al. (2017) and Wang and Ng (2018) are the most related to our current work. The difference and research gap are explained as follows: (i) Although Xiong et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Among the above studies, Xiong et al (2017) and Wang and Ng (2018) are the most related to our current work. The difference and research gap are explained as follows: (i) Although Xiong et al (2017) also studied a resource recovery planning problem in a game-theoretical framework, they focused on the competitive strategies of multiple recovery operators under market competitions.…”
Section: Resource Recovery Planning Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations