2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of Kriging when interpolating in random simulation with heterogeneous variances: Some experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the Lebesgue constant seems to be linear and seems to be in accordance with previous works for the classical EIM (see [4]). The linear increase is far from the theoretical exponential upper bound of (8) and suggests that the bound might not be optimal in sets F of small Kolmogorov n-width. In the example, two types of sensors have been used (of pressure and velocity) and the idea of introducing different types of sensors could be extended to make more adequate distinctions among them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The behavior of the Lebesgue constant seems to be linear and seems to be in accordance with previous works for the classical EIM (see [4]). The linear increase is far from the theoretical exponential upper bound of (8) and suggests that the bound might not be optimal in sets F of small Kolmogorov n-width. In the example, two types of sensors have been used (of pressure and velocity) and the idea of introducing different types of sensors could be extended to make more adequate distinctions among them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…• the obtention (if possible) of a general theory on the impact of Σ on the behavior of (Λ M ) and of a tighter upper bound than the one presented in (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in experiments with random simulation models such as queueing models, the output variances var(w i ) are not constant at all! Fortunately, [12] demonstrates that the Kriging model is not very sensitive to this variance heterogeneity.…”
Section: Kriging: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%