Robustness of Future Changes in Local Precipitation Extremes

Abstract

Reliable projections of future changes in local precipitation extremes are essential for informing policy decisions regarding mitigation and adaptation to climate change. In this paper, the extent to which the natural variability of the climate affects one's ability to project the anthropogenically forced component of change in daily precipitation extremes across Europe is examined. A three-member ensemble of the Hadley Centre Regional Climate Model (HadRM3H) is used and a statistical framework is applied to estimate the uncertainty due to the full spectrum of climate variability. In particular, the results and understanding presented here suggest that annual to multidecadal natural variability may contribute significant uncertainty. For this ensemble projection, extreme precipitation changes at the grid-box level are found to be discernible above climate noise over much of northern and central Europe in winter, and parts of northern and southern Europe in summer. The ability to quantify the change to a reasonable level of accuracy is largely limited to regions in northern Europe. In general, where climate noise has a significant component varying on decadal time scales, single 30-yr climate change projections are insufficient to infer changes in the extreme tail of the underlying precipitation distribution. In this context, the need for ensembles of integrations is demonstrated and the relative effectiveness of spatial pooling and averaging for generating robust signals of extreme precipitation change is also explored. The key conclusions are expected to apply more generally to other models and forcing scenarios.

Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C

“…In addition to the anthropogenic forcing, natural variability is a dominant driver of the climate signal on multi-annual timescales for time-averaged quantities such as mean temperature and precipitation change (Knutti and Sedláček, 2012;Marotzke and Forster, 2014) and in particular for extreme weather events (Kendon et al, 2008;Tebaldi et al, 2011). Thus, natural variability may mask an already present climate change signal and consequently lead to a delayed detection of the imprints of climate change (Tebaldi and Friedlingstein, 2013).…”

Understanding the Effects of Climate Change on Urban Stormwater Infrastructures in the Las Vegas Valley

“…Calculation of the design storm depth from the dataset of homogeneous sites by the RFA using the L-moment is more reliable than a single-site analysis [51]. The sole use of the data from a single grid of area of study has several shortcomings, which were discussed in some recent studies [52]. RFA has been used for a long time to calculate flood frequency analyses such as Burn [53], Castellarin et al [54], and Norbiato et al [55].…”

Changing climate and nutrient transfers: Evidence from high temporal resolution concentration-flow dynamics in headwater catchments

“…The downscaling is justified, as the 5 km grid captures the significant spatial signature which is in the long-term observational weather and climate data (Jones et al, 2010). The use of an ensemble of models within UKCP09 results in the probabilistic projections and ensures that the rainfall projections for a single representative grid cell are more robust (Kendon et al, 2008). For each catchment, 100 runs of 30 years (3000 years in total) were downloaded for baseline conditions (trained on long term observations and for the 2050s, medium emissions scenario.…”