2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2016.2550582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of First- and Second-Order Consensus Algorithms for a Noisy Scale-Free Small-World Koch Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the distinction of their coherence lies in, at least partially, the scale-free property of the pseudofractal scale-free web that is absent in the Farey network. On the other hand, the coherence H FO for the Koch network [32] is a logarithmic function of N , despite its scale-free structure. The reason the coherence for the Koch network is not a constant is because it has only triangles, lacking cycles of different length.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for the distinction of their coherence lies in, at least partially, the scale-free property of the pseudofractal scale-free web that is absent in the Farey network. On the other hand, the coherence H FO for the Koch network [32] is a logarithmic function of N , despite its scale-free structure. The reason the coherence for the Koch network is not a constant is because it has only triangles, lacking cycles of different length.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first-order network coherence H FO and its scaling behavior in different networks have been extensively studied. [30], and Koch graph [32], H FO ∼ ln N ; in the complete graph [27],…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal leader set of a given size k can be found through an exhaustive search of all possible subsets of nodes of size k. This approach, however, is not computationally tractable for anything other than small networks or small values of k. Therefore, much research has been done into deriving efficient approximation algorithms and corresponding bounds for leader selection. Several works have investigated the leader selection problem using convergence rate as a performance measure [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Most notably, the works [11], [8] propose relaxations of the leader *This work was supported in part by NSF grants CNS-1527287 and CNS-1553340.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, analytic solutions have been developed for undirected paths and cycles for an arbitrary number of leaders [15], [16], [17], and for regular trees when the number of leaders is restricted to two [18]. A closed-form expression for coherence in Koch networks with a single noise-free leader was derived in [10], and analysis of the asymptotic scaling of coherence in 1D and 2D directed lattice graphs when leaders are on the boundary was given in [19]. Of particular note is the work of Clark et al [14], which showed that the leader selection problem with noise-free leaders can be expressed as an optimization problem over a submodular set function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%