2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of distributed averaging control in power systems: Time delays & dynamic communication topology

Abstract: Distributed averaging-based integral (DAI) controllers are becoming increasingly popular in power system applications. The literature has thus far primarily focused on disturbance rejection, steady-state optimality and adaption to complex physical system models without considering uncertainties on the cyber and communication layer nor their effect on robustness and performance. In this paper, we derive sufficient delay-dependent conditions for robust stability of a secondary-frequency-DAIcontrolled power syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this light, it is useful to consider strictly decreasing energy functions (Malisoff and Mazenc, 2009). Zhao et al (2015) make a first attempt to arrive at one, and their effort is expanded upon by Schiffer et al (2017) in the context of time-delayed communication. Bearing this in mind, we propose a construction of a new strict Lyapunov function for the purpose of explicitly quantifying the exponential convergence of power networks under distributed averaging integral control and then study the performance of this control in the presence of communication disruptions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this light, it is useful to consider strictly decreasing energy functions (Malisoff and Mazenc, 2009). Zhao et al (2015) make a first attempt to arrive at one, and their effort is expanded upon by Schiffer et al (2017) in the context of time-delayed communication. Bearing this in mind, we propose a construction of a new strict Lyapunov function for the purpose of explicitly quantifying the exponential convergence of power networks under distributed averaging integral control and then study the performance of this control in the presence of communication disruptions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this paper is primarily theoretical: existing approaches to the problem of optimal frequency control have mostly relied on non-strictly decreasing energy -or Lyapunov functions, using LaSalle's invariance principle and related results to guarantee convergence to an invariant manifold on which the Lyapunov function's derivative vanishes (see Schiffer et al, 2017;Vu and Turitsyn, 2017 for exceptions). Since this does not lead to strong results on convergence, we design a strictly decreasing Lyapunov function that does prove exponential convergence to the optimal synchronous solution.…”
Section: Main Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the communication layer can be designed such that the controllers are resilient to communication path failures. In [12], conditions for robust non-linear stability of MGs operated with a distributed averaging integral controller under fast-varying time-delays and switching communication topology are derived. Furthermore, various secondary frequency control policies are compared in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the voltage can be well controlled by Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR). This model and the ones with linearized sine function are widely studied, e.g., [7], [8], [30], [23], [26], [43], [16], in which the frequency dependent nodes are usually used to model the renewable power inverters. The system (1) synchronizes at an equilibrium state, called synchronous state defined as follows [6].…”
Section: Dynamic Model and Secondary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a form of distributed control is proposed for control of power systems, which are either based on passivity method [20], [37], [17], [30], [28], [26], [27] or primal-dual method [42], [16], [43], [34]. In distributed control of a power system, a number of controllers try to achieve the control objectives of the entire network via coordination and cooperation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%