2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31489-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness of Approval-Based Multiwinner Voting Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Yang [64] studied the destructive counterparts of these problems. Faliszewski, Gawron, and Kusek [25], and Gawron and Faliszewski [31] studied the robustness of ABMV rules, which can be considered as variants of bribery problems. Markakis and Papasotiropoulos [46] studied control under conditional approval voting.…”
Section: Related Work and Our Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Yang [64] studied the destructive counterparts of these problems. Faliszewski, Gawron, and Kusek [25], and Gawron and Faliszewski [31] studied the robustness of ABMV rules, which can be considered as variants of bribery problems. Markakis and Papasotiropoulos [46] studied control under conditional approval voting.…”
Section: Related Work and Our Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this fact, the problem of data collection can be turned into electing directly an optimal subset of sensor nodes (i.e., the optimal set of rendezvous points) as the solution, and thus, the delay constraint will be implicitly considered. To this end, we proposed a multiwinner voting-(MV-) [17,18] based algorithm for energy-efficient rendezvous selection. The multiwinner voting is aimed at electing multiple satisfying winners (i.e., optimal rendezvous points) from given candidates (i.e., all sensor nodes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the robustness of outcomes of decision processes has become more and more popular in algorithmic game theory over recent years [2,6,8,15,19,23,24,27]. For instance, in the context of hedonic games, Igarashi et al [16] studied stable outcomes that remain stable even after some agents have been deleted and, in the context of stable matching, Mai and Vazirani [20,21] and Chen et al [11] studied stable matchings that remain stable even if the agents' preferences partly change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%