2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2012.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness in biological regulatory networks II: Application to genetic threshold Boolean random regulatory networks (getBren)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More systematic studies have to be performed in order to confirm the dominant influence of boundary negative interactions, thanks to which the Hopfield-like regulatory interaction networks seem to become more robust [21][22], and also to make more precise their influence on the number of attractors, which is conjectured to diminish, when microRNAs are multiple on the boundary of the interaction graph of the network. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More systematic studies have to be performed in order to confirm the dominant influence of boundary negative interactions, thanks to which the Hopfield-like regulatory interaction networks seem to become more robust [21][22], and also to make more precise their influence on the number of attractors, which is conjectured to diminish, when microRNAs are multiple on the boundary of the interaction graph of the network. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We will use in the following the notion of genetic threshold Boolean random regulatory network (getBren), which is a set N of n random automata defined as follows [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]: 1) any random automaton i of the getBren N owns at time t a state x i (t) valued in {0,1}, 0 (resp. 1) meaning that gene i is inactivated (resp.…”
Section: Micrornas Chromatine Clock and Geneticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which we found the quadratic term of the classical models of contagion. This quadratic term is also present in the interaction potential of Hopfield like networks in which the study of the robustness with respect to the contagion parameter changes has been performed [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] as well as in recent studies taking into account the spatial character of the disease spread. [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Confinement and Saturation The localization of contamination has been treated by different authors.…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let μ = (μ β ) = (μ({β})) be the stationary distribution or invariant measure (over the space of configurations Ω = {0, 1} n , if the network has n genes) of the Markov probability transition matrix P = (P β γ ) γ ,β∈Ω of a getBren observed asymptotically from an initial measure uniform on Ω. Then, the evolutionary entropy H serving as robustness index of the getBrens can be explicitly calculated [10]:…”
Section: Entropy and Robustness In Getbrensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10.1016/j.crma.2012.01.002 entropy of the network [9]. We will in this paper apply the main concepts developed in [9,10], underlying the relationship between complexity and stability in the context of a particular genetic threshold Boolean regulatory network (getBren), the network controlling the feather morphogenesis in chicken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%