2019
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness Envelopes for Temporal Plans

Abstract: To achieve practical execution, planners must produce temporal plans with some degree of run-time adaptability. Such plans can be expressed as Simple Temporal Networks (STN), that constrain the timing of action activations, and implicitly represent the space of choices for the plan executor.A first problem is to verify that all the executor choices allowed by the STN plan will be successful, i.e. the plan is valid. An even more important problem is to assess the effect of discrepancies between the model used f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…run out completely. As a result, there are no discrepancies between the model and the execution environment like in approaches considering robustness envelopes (Cashmore et al 2019). GCNUs are not a stochastic framework and in contrast to POMDP (Kaelbling, Littman, and Cassandra 1998) we do not have beliefs/rewards here.…”
Section: Gcnudynr (N )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…run out completely. As a result, there are no discrepancies between the model and the execution environment like in approaches considering robustness envelopes (Cashmore et al 2019). GCNUs are not a stochastic framework and in contrast to POMDP (Kaelbling, Littman, and Cassandra 1998) we do not have beliefs/rewards here.…”
Section: Gcnudynr (N )mentioning
confidence: 99%