2017
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2017.2677882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness Analysis of a Memristive Crossbar PUF Against Modeling Attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having been implemented with a nominally symmetric layout, the PUF outputs are likely to change from time to time (i.e., poor reliability) [6] when the fluctuation caused by operating conditions and thermal noise is greater than or close to the manufacturing mismatch. The conventional method to improve PUF reliability is based on the use of error correction codes (ECC), while the approach significantly increases the complexity and cost of the design, and worse, the correcting code could reveal some important information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having been implemented with a nominally symmetric layout, the PUF outputs are likely to change from time to time (i.e., poor reliability) [6] when the fluctuation caused by operating conditions and thermal noise is greater than or close to the manufacturing mismatch. The conventional method to improve PUF reliability is based on the use of error correction codes (ECC), while the approach significantly increases the complexity and cost of the design, and worse, the correcting code could reveal some important information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another work expands on this (Uddin et al 2017). Based on that work, we have found the modeling accuracy for a column swapping XbarPUF to be ≈65%, less than with XORed XbarPUF where accuracy is roughly 77% or for the intrinsic XbarPUF that can be modeled with an accuracy of 99% (Uddin et al 2017). This result suggests that both XORing and column swapping provide increased robustness against modeling attacks over the intrinsic XbarPUF.…”
Section: Results Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We have evaluated the prediction accuracy of each variation of XbarPUF against well-known machine learning algorithms. Another work expands on this (Uddin et al 2017). Based on that work, we have found the modeling accuracy for a column swapping XbarPUF to be ≈65%, less than with XORed XbarPUF where accuracy is roughly 77% or for the intrinsic XbarPUF that can be modeled with an accuracy of 99% (Uddin et al 2017).…”
Section: Results Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The set of CRPs is considered as the unique property that distinguishes itself from other PUFs [1][2][3]. To date, there are a several PUF types being researched like the bistable ring PUF [8], the arbiter PUF [1][2][3], the SRAM PUF [9][10][11], crossbar array PUF [12][13][14][15], and the ring oscillator PUF (ROPUF) [5,[16][17][18][19], which is the type of PUF taken into discussion for this research.…”
Section: Introduction 1physically Unclonable Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%