2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2012.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust virtual implementation: Toward a reinterpretation of the Wilson doctrine

Abstract: We study a mechanism design problem where arbitrary restrictions are placed on the sets of first-order beliefs of agents. Calling these restrictions , we use -rationalizability (Battigalli and Siniscalchi, 2003, [5]) as our solution concept, and require that a mechanism virtually implement a socially desirable outcome. We obtain two necessary conditions, -incentive compatibility and -measurability and show that the latter is satisfied as long as a particular zero-measure set of first-order beliefs is ruled out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if the voters have complete information about one another, then any social choice rule can be virtually implemented in Nash equilibrium (Abreu and Sen, 1991) or iterated undominated strategies (Abreu and Matsushima, 1992). Even with incomplete information, a very large class of social choice rules can be virtually implemented in Bayesian Nash equilibrium (Serrano and Vohra, 2005), or even robustly virtually implemented (Artemov et al, 2013). Since virtual implementation is the implementation technology most suited to the probabilistic approach taken in this paper, we consider the implementation problem to be essentially solved, for our purposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if the voters have complete information about one another, then any social choice rule can be virtually implemented in Nash equilibrium (Abreu and Sen, 1991) or iterated undominated strategies (Abreu and Matsushima, 1992). Even with incomplete information, a very large class of social choice rules can be virtually implemented in Bayesian Nash equilibrium (Serrano and Vohra, 2005), or even robustly virtually implemented (Artemov et al, 2013). Since virtual implementation is the implementation technology most suited to the probabilistic approach taken in this paper, we consider the implementation problem to be essentially solved, for our purposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two distinct payo¤ types cannot have the same preference over constant lotteries, i.e., Artemov, Kunimoto, and Serrano (2008) show that if pseudo-type diversity is satis…ed, then robust virtual implementation will always be possible if the appropriate incentive compatibility conditions are satis…ed (their Theorem 1). The idea is that agents' payo¤ types can then be identi…ed by their preferences over constant lotteries and the Abreu and Matsushima (1992c)-style argument applied.…”
Section: Intermediate Robustness Notionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a recent paper, Artemov, Kunimoto, and Serrano (2008) consider what happens to robust virtual implementation results if one imposes some restrictions on agents' beliefs in the payo¤ environment. In particular, call a pair ( i ; i ) 2 i ( i ) a "pseudo-type" and suppose that we add the common knowledge that agent i's pseudo-type ( i ; i ) belongs to a subset T i i ( i ).…”
Section: Intermediate Robustness Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations