2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2014.0134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust ultrasonic reverberation clutter suppression using Multi-Apodization with Cross-correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ASAP's can also be combined with other methods for reducing side and grating lobes, such as DAX beamforming [37], [38], where the transducer aperture is also divided into sub-apertures to increase the quality of B-mode images, and minimum variance beamforming methods [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASAP's can also be combined with other methods for reducing side and grating lobes, such as DAX beamforming [37], [38], where the transducer aperture is also divided into sub-apertures to increase the quality of B-mode images, and minimum variance beamforming methods [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this paper, we propose a new technique called multi-phase apodization with cross-correlation (MPAX), an extension of PAX that is designed to be more robust particularly in an in vivo environment where high reverberation clutter level is expected. This work is also a development of our earlier work in which multiple amplitude apodization pairs are utilized for a similar purpose [24]. We demonstrate in this paper with simulation, experimental phantom, and in vivo imaging results that by utilizing multiple RX phase apodization pairs, MPAX achieves greater suppression of reverberation clutter and thus, greater contrast enhancement when compared with DAX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…By taking advantage of the fact that phase aberration and reverberation clutter effects are predominant at the fundamental frequency, harmonic imaging has been shown to be highly successful in improving image contrast. [8][9][10][11][12] On the other hand, adaptive weighting or adaptive imaging techniques such as the coherence factor (CF) 13 , the generalized coherence factor (GCF), 14 the short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC), 15 the aperture domain model image reconstruction (ADMIRE), 16 dual-apodization with cross-correlation (DAX), 17 and its variants 18,19 have also been proposed. In these techniques, coherence of the received channel data or the correlation of the beamsum data is computed at every pixel location in the field-of-view (FOV) and the corresponding pixel intensity is weighted down by the computed weighting factor to achieve enhanced contrast in the ultrasound image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%