1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9473(94)90122-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust two-group discrimination by bounded influence regression. A Monte Carlo simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both QDA and LDA using the classical estimates in (16) and (18) are vulnerable to the presence of outliers. The problem of the non-robustness of the classical estimates in the setting of the quadratic and linear discriminant analysis has been addressed by many authors: Todorov et al (1990Todorov et al ( , 1994a replaced the classical estimates by MCD estimates; Chork and Rousseeuw (1992) used MVE instead; Hawkins and McLachlan (1997) defined the minimum within-group covariance determinant estimator (MWCD) especially for the case of linear discriminant analysis; He and Fung (2000) and Croux and Dehon (2001) used S estimates;Hubert and Van Driessen (2004) applied the MCD estimates computed by the FAST-MCD algorithm. For a recent review and comparison of these methods see Todorov and Pires (2007).…”
Section: Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both QDA and LDA using the classical estimates in (16) and (18) are vulnerable to the presence of outliers. The problem of the non-robustness of the classical estimates in the setting of the quadratic and linear discriminant analysis has been addressed by many authors: Todorov et al (1990Todorov et al ( , 1994a replaced the classical estimates by MCD estimates; Chork and Rousseeuw (1992) used MVE instead; Hawkins and McLachlan (1997) defined the minimum within-group covariance determinant estimator (MWCD) especially for the case of linear discriminant analysis; He and Fung (2000) and Croux and Dehon (2001) used S estimates;Hubert and Van Driessen (2004) applied the MCD estimates computed by the FAST-MCD algorithm. For a recent review and comparison of these methods see Todorov and Pires (2007).…”
Section: Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, using MVE and MCD estimates, was proposed by Todorov et al (1990Todorov et al ( , 1994a and was also used, based on the MVE estimator by Chork and Rousseeuw (1992). Croux and Dehon (2001) applied this procedure for robustifying linear discriminant analysis based on S estimates.…”
Section: Computing the Common Covariance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures are as followed [6]- [10]: 1) To analyze the problem existing in new product design, and define the relationship between design variables X and response output as a response surface model    …”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we create the OptQuest model and run simulation experiments 1500 times according to distribution characteristics of design variables and constraints condition [4]- [6], and get the optimum of design variables , , , , showed, so design robustness of pressure container has been further improved than that of last time. .…”
Section: ) Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear discriminant analysis procedures that are robust (i.e., insensitive) to departures from the assumption of multivariate normality have been proposed (Todorov, Neykov, & Neytchev, 1994) by replacing the conventional least-squares estimators of means and covariances with robust estimators, such as M-estimators (Croux & Dehon, 2001), minimum covariance determinant (MCD) estimators (Hubert & Van Driessen, 2004;Rousseeuw, 1984), minimum volume ellipsoid (MVE) estimators (Rousseeuw, 1984), and trimmed estimators (Ahmed & Lachenbruch, 1977;Gnanadesikan & Kettenring, 1972;Srivastava & Mudholkar, 2001). However, their emphasis has been primarily on prediction and not on describing the variables that contribute to group separation in non-normal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%