2010
DOI: 10.3182/20100901-3-it-2016.00202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust tubes in nonlinear model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tube-based approaches for nonlinear discrete-time systems have been considered in other works. [19][20][21][22][23] Farina and Scattolini 24 have addressed the linear continuous-time case. In the works of Wang et al 25 and Sun et al, 26 regarding the computation of the offline feedback controller, the discrepancy between the nominal nonlinear system with the corresponding linear system has been considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tube-based approaches for nonlinear discrete-time systems have been considered in other works. [19][20][21][22][23] Farina and Scattolini 24 have addressed the linear continuous-time case. In the works of Wang et al 25 and Sun et al, 26 regarding the computation of the offline feedback controller, the discrepancy between the nominal nonlinear system with the corresponding linear system has been considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube‐based approaches for nonlinear discrete‐time systems have been considered in other works . Farina and Scattolini have addressed the linear continuous‐time case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, one of the current main research thrusts in Model Predictive Control (MPC) is to find techniques that can robustly address uncertainty [1,2,3]. Techniques for handling uncertainty within the MPC framework fall broadly into three categories: (1) min-max formulations, where the performance indices to be minimized are computed with respect to the worst possible disturbance realization [4,5,1], (2) tube-based formulations, where classical (uncertainty-unaware) MPC is modified to use tightened constraints and augmented with a tracking ancillary controller to maintain the system within an invariant tube around the nominal MPC trajectory [6,7,8], and (3) stochastic formulations, where risk-neutral expected values of performance indices (and possibly constraints) are considered [9,10,11,12,13] (see also the recent reviews [1,3]). The main drawback of the min-max approach is that the control law may be too conservative, since the performance index is being optimized under the worst-case disturbance realizations (which may have an arbitrarily small probability of occurring).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tube MPC uses an uncertainty prediction in form of a tube and has been extended to nonlinear predictive control for example in [18], [19]. Nonlinear, robust predictive control approaches for discrete time MPC using the computation of reachable sets are investigated in [20] using Lipschitz continuity and in [21] utilizing interval analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%