2019
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust topology optimization of compliant mechanisms with uncertainties in output stiffness

Abstract: Summary This work addresses the topology optimization approach to design robust compliant mechanisms with respect to uncertainties in the output stiffness, when compared to the traditional deterministic approach. To this end, two formulations are proposed: probabilistic and nonprobabilistic. The probabilistic formulation minimizes a joint objective function of expected output displacement plus a measure of its standard deviations, for given statistical distribution of the output stiffness. The nonprobabilistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The difference of the values of volume fraction of first and second material with their prescribed values in the optimization process material, and it is illustrated that the algorithm can manage these as well. For future work, it is recommended to investigate the ability of the approach in the consideration of the uncertainty in the output stiffness which is demonstrated to be so important [47]. 6 Identified topologies for the cases presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The difference of the values of volume fraction of first and second material with their prescribed values in the optimization process material, and it is illustrated that the algorithm can manage these as well. For future work, it is recommended to investigate the ability of the approach in the consideration of the uncertainty in the output stiffness which is demonstrated to be so important [47]. 6 Identified topologies for the cases presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several remarks can be made regarding the above entropic AC‐MDSA update. First, the derived update (26) and (27) can handle both positive and negative stochastic gradients, thus it is also applicable to RTO problems with other objective functions, such as the compliant mechanism design 12,19 . Second, as long as the initial guess is in the feasible domain, the x˜k (and xk) always stays positive.…”
Section: Accelerated Mirror Descent Stochastic Approximation: Theory and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the classical setting of topology optimization assumes problem‐related parameters that are deterministic, real‐world structures are subjected to various sources of randomness, such as load, material property, and geometry, which can influence the layout of optimized designs. Thus, robust topology optimization (RTO) has been employed to improve the robustness of designs concerning random sources 8‐19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several remarks can be made regarding the above entropic AC-MDSA update. First, the derived update ( 26) and ( 27) can handle both positive and negative stochastic gradients, thus it is also applicable to RTO problems with other objective functions, such as the compliance mechanism design [12,19]. Second, as long as we start from a feasible initial guess, the xk (and x k ) always stays positive.…”
Section: An Entropic Ac-mdsa Tailored For Robust Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the classical setting of topology optimization assumes problem-related parameters that are deterministic, real-world structures are subjected to various sources of randomness, such as load, material property, and geometry, which can influence the layout of optimized designs. Thus, robust topology optimization (RTO) has been employed to improve the robustness of designs concerning random sources [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%