2016
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2015.2506981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Successive Compute-and-Forward Over Multiuser Multirelay Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where (12) is obtained with the same procedure as in (11). Using (4), the SNR received by the destination from the data transmission of the AF-relay is found as…”
Section: A Two-hop Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where (12) is obtained with the same procedure as in (11). Using (4), the SNR received by the destination from the data transmission of the AF-relay is found as…”
Section: A Two-hop Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, finite block-length analysis of relay networks which is of interest in delay-constrained applications, has been rarely studied [3]- [8]. Different decode-and-forward (DF) [9], AF (A:amplify) [10], compute-and-forward [11] and compress-and-forward [12] methods have been proposed for relaying the messages, among which AF and DF are of particular interest due to their simplicity and appropriate data transmission efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper assumes that the transmissions from the relays to the destination are lossless. The process of forwarding the codeword combinations to the destination can be done as in the works of [8,9] by exploiting the coordination from the destination via control messages between the relays and the destination to select which codeword combinations are to be forwarded and which relays to forward. 1 This scenario is considered as data collection in wireless sensor networks or data backhauling in ultra-dense networks, and it is a part of the topologies of these networks.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make λ k (d k ) denser, in addition to forcing to obtain β (i) lm without zero elements at each relay, improving the diversity of the received codeword combinations by increasing the number of participating relays or equipping more antennas at relays as in work of [8,9] might be a solution.…”
Section: Impact Of the Participation Factor Of Each Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The destination can recover the original blocks of all sources from the codeword combinations forwarded from the relays if it receives enough linearly independent (i.e., innovative) codeword combinations. The cooperation between relays can provide the opportunity for the destination to collect enough linearly independent codeword combinations with desired purposes such as obtaining the highest sum rate [ 8 , 9 ] or the highest throughput [ 10 ] while the sources also take part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%