2008
DOI: 10.3182/20080706-5-kr-1001.02091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Stability of Distributed Delay Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose a suitable LyapunovKrasovskii functional and reformulate the resulting parametric matrix inequality using the full-block S-procedure and a convex-hull relaxation in terms of a LMI. Similar arguments have been used in our previous publications [17], [20], [21] that consider distributed delays in the state. Here, we extend these concepts to systems with distributed input delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We choose a suitable LyapunovKrasovskii functional and reformulate the resulting parametric matrix inequality using the full-block S-procedure and a convex-hull relaxation in terms of a LMI. Similar arguments have been used in our previous publications [17], [20], [21] that consider distributed delays in the state. Here, we extend these concepts to systems with distributed input delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Note that d in h d (τ ) must be positive even numbers and the functions in h d (τ ) are not orthogonal over [−r, 0] thus the associated F for h d (τ ) is not a diagonal matrix. Since 0.33 > 0, thus the method in Münz et al (2008) cannot be applied. Furthermore, since φ 1 (τ ) = sin(cos(12τ )) does not satisfy the "differentiation closure" property as in (3), the method in Feng & Nguang (2016b) cannot handle (87).…”
Section: Stability Analysis Of a Distributed Delay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, Theorem 2 can be applied, adapting the scalar λ in (13). The stability condition in [17] states that (17) is stable for a delay interval h up to 5.2. The result in this paper is able to find out a larger delay interval (for which the system remains stable): h = 7.8 for r = 2 and h = 8 for r = 4.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%