2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust stabilisation for non‐linear time‐delay semi‐Markovian jump systems via sliding mode control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark Usually, for Markovian jump systems with time‐varying delays, if we want to obtain the delay‐dependent criteria, the Lyapunov functional is chosen as Vfalse(xt,σt,tfalse)=xTfalse(tfalse)Pσfalse(tfalse)xfalse(tfalse)+tτMtxTfalse(sfalse)Qxfalse(sfalse)ds+tτMtθtxTfalse(sfalse)Wxfalse(sfalse)dsdθ whose parameters in integral term are mode independent, which may lead to some conservativeness. In our work, a proper mode‐dependent Lyapunov functional is constructed to get the delay‐dependent criteria, and the parameters in the single integral term of V ( x t , σ t , t ) are mode dependent, which may reduce some conservativeness regardless of the increasing computational complexity . Furthermore, augmented Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functionals or Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functionals with multiple‐integral terms may contribute to further reduce the conservativeness for the time‐delay systems, but the Lyapunov function is more complicated and will bring more tedious computations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark Usually, for Markovian jump systems with time‐varying delays, if we want to obtain the delay‐dependent criteria, the Lyapunov functional is chosen as Vfalse(xt,σt,tfalse)=xTfalse(tfalse)Pσfalse(tfalse)xfalse(tfalse)+tτMtxTfalse(sfalse)Qxfalse(sfalse)ds+tτMtθtxTfalse(sfalse)Wxfalse(sfalse)dsdθ whose parameters in integral term are mode independent, which may lead to some conservativeness. In our work, a proper mode‐dependent Lyapunov functional is constructed to get the delay‐dependent criteria, and the parameters in the single integral term of V ( x t , σ t , t ) are mode dependent, which may reduce some conservativeness regardless of the increasing computational complexity . Furthermore, augmented Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functionals or Lyapunov‐Krasovskii functionals with multiple‐integral terms may contribute to further reduce the conservativeness for the time‐delay systems, but the Lyapunov function is more complicated and will bring more tedious computations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, a proper mode-dependent Lyapunov functional (11) is constructed to get the delay-dependent criteria, and the parameters in the single integral term of V(x t , t , t) are mode dependent, which may reduce some conservativeness regardless of the increasing computational complexity. 29 Furthermore, augmented Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals 30 or Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals with multiple-integral terms 31 may contribute to further reduce the conservativeness for the time-delay systems, but the Lyapunov function is more complicated and will bring more tedious computations.…”
Section: H ∞ Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such controller is also insensitive to the external perturbation and parameter variation . A few results on SMC for switched systems and singular systems with or without time‐varying delays have been considered . However, there is not much work on SMC for singular switched systems with time‐varying delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, much effort has been devoted to eliminating the negative effects of time-delays onto whole system performance and a great number of SMC techniques have been developed for delayed systems with different types of time-delays, see e.g. Qi, Park, Cheng, & Kao (2017), Jiang, Kao, & Gao (2017), Hu, Wang, Gao, & Stergioulas (2012b) and Wu, Su, & Shi (2012). To be specific, the problem of robust stabilization has been tackled in Qi et al (2017) for semi-MJSs with time-varying delays via SMC method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qi, Park, Cheng, & Kao (2017), Jiang, Kao, & Gao (2017), Hu, Wang, Gao, & Stergioulas (2012b) and Wu, Su, & Shi (2012). To be specific, the problem of robust stabilization has been tackled in Qi et al (2017) for semi-MJSs with time-varying delays via SMC method. In Jiang et al (2017), the integrator-based robust H ∞ SMC method has been proposed for stochastic MJSs with slow time-varying delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%