1994
DOI: 10.1006/jvci.1994.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Spatial Autoregressive Modeling for Hardwood Log Inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we let denote the asymptotic functional form of , (16) reduces to (19) The asymptotic influence function of the estimator at is defined as the Gâteaux derivative [16] given by (20) It is the directional derivative of in the direction of at . To derive it, let us first substitute (18) into (19) to get (21) Differentiating with respect to , it follows: (22) Evaluating (22) at , assuming Fisher consistency given by , and interchanging differentiation and integration in the first term of the summation, we get (23) Applying the chain rule to the kernel of the first integral and using the sifting property of the Dirac measure, we obtain (24) Solving for , we get (25) Deriving given by (17) with respect to while assuming that and are independent of over the neighborhood where the derivative is applied, it follows: (26) where is the Hessian matrix of , which is equal to . Applying the chain rule to the derivative of with respect to and using the fact that , we obtain (27) where .…”
Section: Influence Function Of the Gm-estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we let denote the asymptotic functional form of , (16) reduces to (19) The asymptotic influence function of the estimator at is defined as the Gâteaux derivative [16] given by (20) It is the directional derivative of in the direction of at . To derive it, let us first substitute (18) into (19) to get (21) Differentiating with respect to , it follows: (22) Evaluating (22) at , assuming Fisher consistency given by , and interchanging differentiation and integration in the first term of the summation, we get (23) Applying the chain rule to the kernel of the first integral and using the sifting property of the Dirac measure, we obtain (24) Solving for , we get (25) Deriving given by (17) with respect to while assuming that and are independent of over the neighborhood where the derivative is applied, it follows: (26) where is the Hessian matrix of , which is equal to . Applying the chain rule to the derivative of with respect to and using the fact that , we obtain (27) where .…”
Section: Influence Function Of the Gm-estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In signal processing, the M-estimators introduced by Huber in 1964 [16] and the least median of squares (LMS) estimator proposed by Rousseeuw and Leroy [18] have received a great deal of attention [20], [21]. In particular, the use of M-estimators has been advocated for a broad range of applications such as spectrum estimation [22], multiuser detection in wireless communications [23], image filtering [24], and image modeling for log defect recognition [25] and classification [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textile, paper, glass, wood, metal, food, and industrial parts on a conveyor belt can all be cited under this heading. Computer tomography images were employed to detect internal defects in hardwood logs [2]. Multi-thresholding, morphological processing, and focus of attention mechanisms were used for the segmentation and recognition of the defects [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textile, paper, glass, wood, metal, food, and industrial parts on a conveyor belt can all be cited under this heading. Computer tomography images were employed to detect internal defects in hardwood logs [15]. Multi-thresholding, morphological processing, and focus of attention mechanisms were used for the segmentation and recognition of the defects [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%