Oceans 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2008.5151916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust search for structured object placement using unmanned vehicles

Abstract: We develop a robust method for planning an undersea search by unmanned vehicles; the goal of which is to find groups of objects that may be placed randomly or arranged in predefined patterns on the ocean floor. This approach revolves around the computation of target pattern priors that describe the underlying geometrical structure of the expected group of objects. These priors are updated based on limited search observations, followed by a search performance assessment in the remaining region utilizing these o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where r = range to target, and = target aspect relative to sensor and p d2 (r, ) = probability-of-detection for sensor 2 (2) For each sensor, if we consider all detection opportunities as independent Bernoulli trials [4], the probability of detecting a target at least once using the non-aggregate sensor performances as defined in Equations (1) and (2) is ( 3 ) Now define the typical aggregate sensor performances (4) and (5) where f( ) = probability density function of target aspect (6)…”
Section: Detailed Discussion Of Theoretical Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where r = range to target, and = target aspect relative to sensor and p d2 (r, ) = probability-of-detection for sensor 2 (2) For each sensor, if we consider all detection opportunities as independent Bernoulli trials [4], the probability of detecting a target at least once using the non-aggregate sensor performances as defined in Equations (1) and (2) is ( 3 ) Now define the typical aggregate sensor performances (4) and (5) where f( ) = probability density function of target aspect (6)…”
Section: Detailed Discussion Of Theoretical Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Scenario (1) detects significant p(k 1) variability as well as significantly different average p(k 1) over aspect angle. Scenario (2) shows no variability over aspect and it is fact incapable of detecting any such variability. Furthermore, Scenario (2) underestimates p(k 1)'s standard deviation by 37%.…”
Section: B Scenario 1 -Cross-hatching With Aspect-dependent Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations