Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets IX 2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.542731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust score-based feature vectors for algorithm fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourteen difficult images, including the two shown in the Figures 3 and 4, were selected for analysis. These were normalized by the two normalizers and processed by the same D/C algorithm [2][3][4][5] . Under both normalizers, the D/C algorithm detected and classified the same mines; however there was marked reduction in the false alarms with the SFBF normalized image as shown in the Table 1.…”
Section: Impact On False Alarm Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen difficult images, including the two shown in the Figures 3 and 4, were selected for analysis. These were normalized by the two normalizers and processed by the same D/C algorithm [2][3][4][5] . Under both normalizers, the D/C algorithm detected and classified the same mines; however there was marked reduction in the false alarms with the SFBF normalized image as shown in the Table 1.…”
Section: Impact On False Alarm Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, (1) majority voting (or more generally m out of n) where the detections can be conditioned on thresholds applied to the scores, (2) computing the sum of the algorithm scores and comparing the sum to a threshold, or (3) computing a linear combination of the scores and comparing the weighted sum to a threshold. And there are many others [6]- [12].…”
Section: Score-based Fusion Rulementioning
confidence: 99%