2021
DOI: 10.12681/bgsg.27058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Satellite Techniques for mapping thermal anomalies possibly related to seismic activity of March 2021, Thessaly Earthquakes.

Abstract: In recent years, there is a growing interest concerning the development of a multi-parametric system for earthquakes’ short term forecast identifying those parameters whose anomalous variations can be associated to the complex process of such events. In this context, the Robust Satellite Technique (RST) has been adopted herein with the aim to detect and map thermal anomalies probably related with the strong earthquake of M6.3 occurred near the city of Larissa, Thessaly on March 3rd 2021 10:16:07 UTC. For this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the specific Robust Estimator of TIR Anomalies (RETIRA) index was introduced [25,35], emphasising the better signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio achievable by using geostationary satellites. After that, a number of independent studies evaluating (e.g., [36,37]) or simply applying [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] the RST approach and RETIRA index were published. The RST methodology has been then further tested, enhancing their main limitations and potential (e.g., [46] and references therein] in the most seismic active areas of the world belonging to different climatic areas and geo-tectonic settings such as Algeria [47], India [48], California [46], Greece [49], Italy [13,[26][27][28][50][51][52][53], Taiwan [54], China [55], and Japan [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the specific Robust Estimator of TIR Anomalies (RETIRA) index was introduced [25,35], emphasising the better signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio achievable by using geostationary satellites. After that, a number of independent studies evaluating (e.g., [36,37]) or simply applying [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] the RST approach and RETIRA index were published. The RST methodology has been then further tested, enhancing their main limitations and potential (e.g., [46] and references therein] in the most seismic active areas of the world belonging to different climatic areas and geo-tectonic settings such as Algeria [47], India [48], California [46], Greece [49], Italy [13,[26][27][28][50][51][52][53], Taiwan [54], China [55], and Japan [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of this "natural noise" can be the atmospheric weather or several variations in vegetation (natural or planted) or man-made constructions, topography and climate over space and time. As shown in previous works (e.g., [2,19,20,27,28,44,45]), the advantage of the RST methodology compared to other approaches is its ability to isolate residual thermal variations which are probably connected to tectonic activity. Over the past two decades, the RST method has been applied worldwide in several geotectonic regimes and to earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 4.0.…”
Section: Robust Satellite Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several satellite sensors, which have channels in the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, can monitor Earth's thermal field and generate a Land Surface Temperature (LST) product with variable spatiotemporal resolution depending on the satellite/sensor system chosen [6][7][8][9]. Therefore, LST can be used as a critical guide to the understanding of land surface processes at various scales [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and environments, especially in Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3413 2 of 20 areas with a variability in geophysical parameters such as vegetation, topography, geology and geomorphometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong Mw = 6.3 earthquake occurred on March 3 rd , 2021, and was followed by another strong Mw = 6.0 event (Figure 1) on March 4 th , 2021 [Karakostas et al, 2021;Koukouvelas et al, 2021;Lekkas et al, 2021;Mavroulis et al, 2021;Papadopoulos et al, 2021;Kassaras et al, 2022;Michas et al, 2022]. The mainshock and its aftershocks caused observable ground deformations [De Novellis et al, 2021;Tolomei et al, 2021;Song et al, 2022;Yang et al, 2022] and thermal anomalies [Kouli et al, 2021]. The direction of extension determined for the 2021 sequence was reported to be different than the known stress regime in the area [Galanakis et al, 2021;Lazos et al, 2021].…”
Section: George Kavirismentioning
confidence: 98%