2020
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2019.2925919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Resolution of Velocity Ambiguity for Multifrequency Pulse-to-Pulse Coherent Doppler Sonars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x n (t) = A cos(ω c t + ϕ n )w n (t) (9) where A is the signal amplitude, ϕ n is the initial carrier phase of the nth symbol, w n (t) = u(t − nT c ) − u(t − nT c − T c ) is the time window function, T c is the chip width, and u(t) is the unit step function. Equations ( 8) and ( 9) can be substituted into Equation (3) in order to obtain the expression of the broadband echo signal:…”
Section: Broadband Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x n (t) = A cos(ω c t + ϕ n )w n (t) (9) where A is the signal amplitude, ϕ n is the initial carrier phase of the nth symbol, w n (t) = u(t − nT c ) − u(t − nT c − T c ) is the time window function, T c is the chip width, and u(t) is the unit step function. Equations ( 8) and ( 9) can be substituted into Equation (3) in order to obtain the expression of the broadband echo signal:…”
Section: Broadband Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incoherent method is suitable for applications where the detection range and velocity measurement range are large, while high stratification and velocity measurement accuracy are not required. The coherent method has high range and velocity resolution, but has the shortcoming of range-velocity ambiguity [8,9]; it is suitable for shallow water applications with thin layer thickness, where high velocity measurement accuracy is required. The broadband method combines the advantages of the incoherent and coherent methods, while its range and velocity resolution no longer restrict one another [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the range of χ r (t, f ) on the t-axis is |t| ≤ τ, χ r (t, f ) with different delays in Equation ( 11) will not be aliased, and the ambiguity function |χ r (t, f )| is equal to the sum of the amplitudes of all the summation terms in Equation (11). Equation (11) shows that the ambiguity function of the phase-encoded signal is superimposed by rectangular pulse ambiguity functions with different delays after amplitude weighting, and the weighting coefficient is related to the autocorrelation characteristics of the encoding. The distance and speed resolution performance of |χ r (t, f )| is mainly determined by its main peak.…”
Section: Relationship Between Velocity Estimation Accuracy and Waveform Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement methods used in ADCP include pulse incoherent method [ 8 ], pulse coherent method [ 9 , 10 , 11 ] and broadband method [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Since the broadband method combines the advantages of the incoherent method and the coherent method, it has become the most popular choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust CRT claims that even though every remainder has a small error, a large nonnegative integer can be robustly reconstructed in the sense that the reconstruction error is upper bounded by the bound of the remainder errors. Beyond these applications aforementioned, the robust CRT has offered useful applications in multi-wavelength optical measurement [25]- [27], distance or velocity ambiguity resolution [28]- [31], fault-tolerant wireless sensor networks [32]- [34], error-control neural coding [35]- [37], etc. It is worth pointing out that the (robust) CRT has been generalized to (robustly) reconstruct multiple large nonnegative integers from their unordered remainder sets as well [38]- [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%