1992
DOI: 10.2307/2348552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Regression Estimators-The Choice of Tuning Constants

Abstract: The robust regression estimators of Huber and Welsch and the bounded influence estimators of Krasker and Welsch require the specification of a cut‐off or tuning constant before they are fully defined. Here the asymptotic mean squared errors of these estimators under different designs/distributions for the explanatory variables and different error distribution are computed. The choice of tuning constants seems to be critical in the trade‐off between bias and variance. The choice illuminates the differences in b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Fan et al 1994;Welsh 1994). It has been shown that this type of robustification approach is suitable for a large range of contaminated distributions (Kelly 1992). The M-type estimator described here directly follows from that developed by Pinson et al (2007) for local polynomial regression with time-varying coefficients.…”
Section: Robustification Of the Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Fan et al 1994;Welsh 1994). It has been shown that this type of robustification approach is suitable for a large range of contaminated distributions (Kelly 1992). The M-type estimator described here directly follows from that developed by Pinson et al (2007) for local polynomial regression with time-varying coefficients.…”
Section: Robustification Of the Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To address the small sample size and high variances, a robust linear regression based on maximum likelihood type estimators (M-estimators) (e.g., Huber & Ronchetti, 2009;Stuart, 2011) was preferred. Following common usage and a couple of successful simulation studies, Huber's M-estimator was selected (Kelly, 1992;Lambert-Lacroix & Zwald, 2011;Stuart, 2011), with Huber's tuning constant set to its default value of 1.345 (Mathworks, 2016). Given the high variances and potential breakpoints in the data, the statistical significances of the breakpoints needed to be estimated without any assumptions of normally, identically, and independently distributed residuals.…”
Section: Statistical Tests For Breakpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krasker & Welsch (1982), Kelly (1992), Kelly (1996), Warwick (2005), and Warwick & Jones (2005). Krasker, Kuh & Welsch (1983) point out that a bound value o f around two is a good choice for the Krasker-Welsch estimator for diagnostic purposes.…”
Section: Lad Estimation With Bounded Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krasker, Kuh & Welsch (1983) point out that a bound value o f around two is a good choice for the Krasker-Welsch estimator for diagnostic purposes. However as Kelly (1992) shows, the choice o f the tuning constant is extremely important in the trade off between estimator variance and estimator bias. Kelly (1992) also demonstrates that the optimal tuning constant can be significantly different from two.…”
Section: Lad Estimation With Bounded Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation