1996
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(96)00138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust receding horizon optimal control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the CVP approach is straightforward to implement, it tends to be slow, especially in dealing with inequality path constraints [6]. This is mainly due to the fact that this feasible path method requires repeated and expensive solution of the differential equations.…”
Section: Sequential Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the CVP approach is straightforward to implement, it tends to be slow, especially in dealing with inequality path constraints [6]. This is mainly due to the fact that this feasible path method requires repeated and expensive solution of the differential equations.…”
Section: Sequential Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, instead, we use Pontryagin's minimum principle to select them. Although the idea of using Pontryagin's principle together with RH control is not new [14], [15], this has not been considered for tumor growth control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the CVP approach is straightforward to implement, it tends to be slow, especially in dealing with inequality path constraints [Bell et al (1996)]. This is mainly due to the fact that this feasible path method requires repeated and expensive solution of the differential equations.…”
Section: Direct Methods: the Sequential Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%