2015
DOI: 10.1287/opre.2015.1367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Queueing Theory

Abstract: We propose an alternative approach for studying queues based on robust optimization. We model the uncertainty in the arrivals and services via polyhedral uncertainty sets which are inspired from the limit laws of probability. Using the generalized central limit theorem, this framework allows to model heavy-tailed behavior characterized by bursts of rapidly occurring arrivals and long service times. We take a worst-case approach and obtain closed form upper bounds on the system time in a multi-server queue. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, f is a performance/risk measure that depends on a random element X and a decision variable b that can be chosen from an action space B. The solution to the above problem minimizes worstcase risk over a family of ambiguous probability measures P. Such an ambiguity-averse optimal choice is also referred as a distributionally robust choice, because the performance of the chosen decision variable is guaranteed to be better than OPT irrespective of the model picked from the family P. (2015) for KL-divergence and other likelihood based uncertainty sets, Pflug and Wozabal (2007); Wozabal (2012); Esfahani and Kuhn (2015); Zhao and Guan (2015); Gao and Kleywegt (2016) for Wasserstein distance based neighborhoods, Erdogan and Iyengar (2006) for neighborhoods based on Prokhorov metric, Bandi et al (2015); Bandi and Bertsimas (2014) for uncertainty sets based on statistical tests and Ben-Tal et al (2009); Bertsimas and Sim (2004) for a general overview. As most of the works mentioned above assume the random element X to be R d -valued, it is of our interest in the following example to demonstrate the usefulness of our framework in formulating and solving distributionally robust optimization problems that involve stochastic processes taking values in general Polish spaces as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, f is a performance/risk measure that depends on a random element X and a decision variable b that can be chosen from an action space B. The solution to the above problem minimizes worstcase risk over a family of ambiguous probability measures P. Such an ambiguity-averse optimal choice is also referred as a distributionally robust choice, because the performance of the chosen decision variable is guaranteed to be better than OPT irrespective of the model picked from the family P. (2015) for KL-divergence and other likelihood based uncertainty sets, Pflug and Wozabal (2007); Wozabal (2012); Esfahani and Kuhn (2015); Zhao and Guan (2015); Gao and Kleywegt (2016) for Wasserstein distance based neighborhoods, Erdogan and Iyengar (2006) for neighborhoods based on Prokhorov metric, Bandi et al (2015); Bandi and Bertsimas (2014) for uncertainty sets based on statistical tests and Ben-Tal et al (2009); Bertsimas and Sim (2004) for a general overview. As most of the works mentioned above assume the random element X to be R d -valued, it is of our interest in the following example to demonstrate the usefulness of our framework in formulating and solving distributionally robust optimization problems that involve stochastic processes taking values in general Polish spaces as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark on how our choice of service time uncertainty sets and their structure affect our results, and possible ways to calibrate the sets using data and probabilistic guarantees. For an elaborate motivation and justification based on limit theorems, we refer the interested reader to Bandi and Bertsimas (2012) and Bandi et al (2015a).…”
Section: A Service Time Uncertainty Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ is chosen to match the percentile of interest, see Bandi et al (2015a) for details. Note that in order to estimate the average clearing time, we heuristically select Γ = 0.5, which exhibits good numerical performance.…”
Section: B1 Known Queue Population Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…telephone exchange), manufacturing systems and service systems (petrol station, supermarket, hospital etc.). Telephone exchange is the first problems (congestion problems) solved using queueing theory and was done by Erlang (Bandi et al, 2013;Quantitative Module D, 2009). His works inspired engineers, mathematicians to deal with queueing problems using (Balsam and Marin, 2007;Adan and Resing, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%