2008
DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.1.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust principal components: A generalized variance perspective

Abstract: This article compares several methods for performing robust principal component analysis, two of which have not been considered in previous articles. The criterion here, unlike that of extant articles aimed at comparing methods, is how well a method maximizes a robust version of the generalized variance of the projected data. This is in contrast to maximizing some measure of scatter associated with the marginal distributions of the projected scores, which does not take into account the overall structure of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the computation time of the algorithms in seconds, averaged over M = 50 replications. Not surprisingly, we see that spherical PCA is the fastest to compute because it does not require any iterative process (see also Maronna, 2005;Wilcox, 2008). For n = 1000 and q = 2 projection-pursuit is relatively fast to compute regardless of the dimension of the data, as can be seen from Table 2.…”
Section: Computation Timementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Table 2 shows the computation time of the algorithms in seconds, averaged over M = 50 replications. Not surprisingly, we see that spherical PCA is the fastest to compute because it does not require any iterative process (see also Maronna, 2005;Wilcox, 2008). For n = 1000 and q = 2 projection-pursuit is relatively fast to compute regardless of the dimension of the data, as can be seen from Table 2.…”
Section: Computation Timementioning
confidence: 68%