2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Potassium Isotopic Analysis of Geological and Biological Samples via Multicollector ICP-Mass Spectrometry Using the “Extra-High Resolution Mode”

Abstract: Potassium isotopic analysis is arousing increasing interest, not only in geochemistry, but also in biomedicine. However, real-life applications are still hindered by the lack of robustness of the methods used. In this work, a novel and robust method for high-precision K isotopic analysis of geological and biological samples was developed, based on the use of a multicollector ICP-mass spectrometer providing a mass resolving power of 15,000 (extra-high resolution mode, XHR). After evaluation of different measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IAPSO seawater gives a δ 41 K value of 0.03 ± 0.02‰ (2SD, n = 2), slightly lower than the accepted average seawater δ 41 K value of 0.12 ± 0.07‰ (2SD, n = 46), 25 but still in the range of isotopic variability. The tuna fish ERM-CE 464 reference material yields a δ 41 K value of 0.38 ± 0.01‰ (2SD, n = 2), consistent with the value of 0.31 ± 0.05‰ (2SD, n = 2) reported by Moynier et al , 15 and the lobster hepatopancreas TORT-3 reference material gives a δ 41 K value of −0.29 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2), consistent with the value of −0.31 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 3) reported by Hobin et al 18 The δ 41 K value of the DORM-4 fish protein is −0.24 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2). The bovine liver SRM-1577c gives a δ 41 K value of 0.15 ± 0.004‰ (2SD, n = 2), different from the bovine liver ERM-BB185 reported by Moynier et al 15 at −0.22 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2), showing a metabolic influence of the hepatic K isotope composition that remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…IAPSO seawater gives a δ 41 K value of 0.03 ± 0.02‰ (2SD, n = 2), slightly lower than the accepted average seawater δ 41 K value of 0.12 ± 0.07‰ (2SD, n = 46), 25 but still in the range of isotopic variability. The tuna fish ERM-CE 464 reference material yields a δ 41 K value of 0.38 ± 0.01‰ (2SD, n = 2), consistent with the value of 0.31 ± 0.05‰ (2SD, n = 2) reported by Moynier et al , 15 and the lobster hepatopancreas TORT-3 reference material gives a δ 41 K value of −0.29 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2), consistent with the value of −0.31 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 3) reported by Hobin et al 18 The δ 41 K value of the DORM-4 fish protein is −0.24 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2). The bovine liver SRM-1577c gives a δ 41 K value of 0.15 ± 0.004‰ (2SD, n = 2), different from the bovine liver ERM-BB185 reported by Moynier et al 15 at −0.22 ± 0.03‰ (2SD, n = 2), showing a metabolic influence of the hepatic K isotope composition that remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results generally show a decreasing d 41 K value with increasing K concentration mismatch, except for the study of Gu et al 4 in which the 41 K/ 39 K ratio is measured using a Neptune + under cold plasma and low-resolution conditions. Our results show a weaker dependency to K concentration mismatch compared to CC-MC-ICP-MS, 13,15 but a higher dependency compared to a dummy bucket-or XHR-equipped MC-ICP-MS 8,18 (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations