2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2369/1/012033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust path following control for autonomous vehicle considering actuator fault

Abstract: The development of drive-by-wire chassis technology increases the flexibility of vehicle dynamic control. However, more actuators have higher potential failure risk and lead model mismatch, which brings a severe challenge for the control precision and system robustness. Regarding to the potential failure risk of the steering actuator, this research presents a feedback gain scheduling H∞ controller for autonomous vehicle path tracking. Firstly, the linear parameter-varying (LPV) model is established considering… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault-tolerant control currently has two development directions: active fault-tolerant control and passive fault-tolerant control [10,11]. In the field of vehicle fault-tolerant control, scholars have proposed a variety of active and passive fault-tolerant control strategies, including sliding mode control [12,13], adaptive control [14][15][16], fuzzy neural network control [17,18], and robust H∞ and LPV control [19][20][21][22]. Passive fault-tolerant control is advantageous over active fault-tolerant control because it does not require fault detection and isolation units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fault-tolerant control currently has two development directions: active fault-tolerant control and passive fault-tolerant control [10,11]. In the field of vehicle fault-tolerant control, scholars have proposed a variety of active and passive fault-tolerant control strategies, including sliding mode control [12,13], adaptive control [14][15][16], fuzzy neural network control [17,18], and robust H∞ and LPV control [19][20][21][22]. Passive fault-tolerant control is advantageous over active fault-tolerant control because it does not require fault detection and isolation units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For damper faults as well as brake actuator faults, the three systems of steering, braking, and suspension are activated hierarchically and coordinated with each other by scheduling different parameters under the framework of the LPV system so as to improve vehicle comfort and stability [20]. For steering actuator faults, an LPV model for actuator faults containing velocity changes is developed, and the tracking and robust performance of the system is ensured by a robust control algorithm [21]. A fault-tolerant predictive controller is proposed for active suspension system sensor faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%