2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-004-0410-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust optimization using a gradient index: MEMS applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to simplify the design problem, a constraint of the current quench condition on the superconductivity magnet is not considered here. A typical optimization problem for minimizing an objective function subject to a set of constraints is expressed as (5) where is the stray field values calculated at the th measurement point along line a and line b, is the stored magnetic energy, and is the energy target value of 180 MJ. The design variable vector consists of six parameters describing the dimensions of the magnet and the two current densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In order to simplify the design problem, a constraint of the current quench condition on the superconductivity magnet is not considered here. A typical optimization problem for minimizing an objective function subject to a set of constraints is expressed as (5) where is the stray field values calculated at the th measurement point along line a and line b, is the stored magnetic energy, and is the energy target value of 180 MJ. The design variable vector consists of six parameters describing the dimensions of the magnet and the two current densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]- [5]. Until now, most of the reported attempts have used the Taguchi's robust design concept or Monte Carlo simulation based on the assumption that design parameters are random variables with a probability distribution [2]- [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the aforementioned method requires the additional efforts on the handling of multi-objective function, and derivative information about both objective function and constraints should be provided; the evaluation of derivative based design sensitivity is computation-ally expensive, especially when commercial CAE tools are used. A number of studies have been conducted to develop design methodologies (6) - (8) and engineering applications (9) - (12) in the context of robust optimization. The present paper describes a new robust optimization method to account for both the tolerance in design variable (controllable factor) and the variation in problem parameter (uncontrollable factor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%