2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust optimization of 2D airfoils driven by full Navier–Stokes computations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only three parameters are required to describe their shape. Nowadays, the most widely used airfoil shape parameterization methods are the Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) [27], and the Bézier curves [49] (a special case of NURBS). These methods use a set of control points to define the airfoil shape and are general enough so that (nearly) any airfoil shape can be generated.…”
Section: Flow Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only three parameters are required to describe their shape. Nowadays, the most widely used airfoil shape parameterization methods are the Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) [27], and the Bézier curves [49] (a special case of NURBS). These methods use a set of control points to define the airfoil shape and are general enough so that (nearly) any airfoil shape can be generated.…”
Section: Flow Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic algorithms (GAs) have proven their strength against local extrema and numerical noise in aerodynamic optimization and their validity in problems with constraints [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the optimization tool, it was decided to make use of a MOGA. Genetic algorithms were successfully applied for some time now to shape optimization in aeronautics [32][33][34][35]. In spite of their cost, GAs have proved their usefulness with respect to gradient-based methods, because of their high flexibility [stemming from the fact that they only require values of the objective function(s) to efficiently explore the parameter space in search of an optimum] and also because of their ability to find global optima of multimodal problems.…”
Section: B Pareto-based Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%