2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcc.2021.3051018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Optimization Model for Primary and Backup Resource Allocation in Cloud Providers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To guarantee service delivery, Refs. [18], [22], [23] proposed heuristic and approximate approaches to handle single and mixed-type failure. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To guarantee service delivery, Refs. [18], [22], [23] proposed heuristic and approximate approaches to handle single and mixed-type failure. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [18] proposed a primary and backup resource allocation model using probabilistic protection to protect the deployed services. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee service delivery, Refs. [18], [22], [23] proposed heuristic and approximate approaches to handle single and mixed-type failure. Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], a constraint-based PV admittance capacity planning method is proposed, but using a single scenario lacks accounting for DG output uncertainty. In [11], a robust optimization model considering DG output uncertainty is proposed, but the calculation results based on the robust optimization method are too conservative. In [12], a distributed robust optimization model-based admittance capacity assessment method is proposed by transforming the model considering the conditional risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the nonlinear constraint Equation(11), the large M method is used to linearize and replace this constraint by introducing binary variables b and c, and the constant large M as shown in Eqs. (15)-(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%