2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1492134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined

Abstract: O ptimization of simulated systems is the goal of many methods, but most methods assume known environments. We, however, develop a "robust" methodology that accounts for uncertain environments. Our methodology uses Taguchi's view of the uncertain world but replaces his statistical techniques by design and analysis of simulation experiments based on Kriging (Gaussian process model); moreover, we use bootstrapping to quantify the variability in the estimated Kriging metamodels. In addition, we combine Kriging wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of (Mollaghasemi and Evans 1994), falls into the category of iterative multiple criteria optimization, although their approach favors the definition of a preference structure among PMs a priori, which departs from the non-parametric point of view advocated in this work. The works of (Zakerifar, Biles, and Evans 2011;Couckuyt, Deschrijver, and Dhaene 2012;Dellino, Kleijnen, and Meloni 2012) approach multiple criteria simulation optimization models using Kriging models with various degrees of success, adding evidence to the soundness of using metamodeling strategies to support the determination of competitive solutions in the presence of conflicting PMs. Indeed, there seems to be interest in the assessment of multiple criteria using simulation in different production applications such as planning and scheduling (Duvivier et al 2007), inventory management (Mortazavi and Arshadi khamseh 2014), as well as scientific endeavors such as the analysis of intermolecular interaction (St6bener et al 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of (Mollaghasemi and Evans 1994), falls into the category of iterative multiple criteria optimization, although their approach favors the definition of a preference structure among PMs a priori, which departs from the non-parametric point of view advocated in this work. The works of (Zakerifar, Biles, and Evans 2011;Couckuyt, Deschrijver, and Dhaene 2012;Dellino, Kleijnen, and Meloni 2012) approach multiple criteria simulation optimization models using Kriging models with various degrees of success, adding evidence to the soundness of using metamodeling strategies to support the determination of competitive solutions in the presence of conflicting PMs. Indeed, there seems to be interest in the assessment of multiple criteria using simulation in different production applications such as planning and scheduling (Duvivier et al 2007), inventory management (Mortazavi and Arshadi khamseh 2014), as well as scientific endeavors such as the analysis of intermolecular interaction (St6bener et al 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [12] pointed out that the two-layer Kriging model can reduce uncertainty analysis, and then improved the computational efficiency. Through cross-validation, Dellino et al [6] proved that two-layer Kriging model has smaller relative prediction errors than one-layer Kriging model. Thus, we use two-layer Kriging model to conduct simulation optimization. )…”
Section: B Two-layer Kriging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers use some statistical methods to describe the distribution of demand rate such as normal distribution and exponential distribution [5][6]. But the assumption that the demand rate follows normal distribution is not very reasonable for new items and deteriorating items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations