2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.endm.2013.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Optimization for the Connected Facility Location Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bardossy and Raghavan (2013) proposed a robust version of the problem based on the framework introduced by Bertsimas and Sim (2003). In particular, they proposed a heuristic based on the dual-ascent based local search for the basic ConFL problem proposed in the latter paper.…”
Section: Other Variants Of the Connected Facility Location Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bardossy and Raghavan (2013) proposed a robust version of the problem based on the framework introduced by Bertsimas and Sim (2003). In particular, they proposed a heuristic based on the dual-ascent based local search for the basic ConFL problem proposed in the latter paper.…”
Section: Other Variants Of the Connected Facility Location Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eiselt and Marianov [24] studied WTE facility location planning problems under uncertainty from a government perspective in a cost-effective and environmental-friendly way. Bardossy and Raghavan [25] presented a robust optimization model for the connected facility location problem within the framework and extend the BS robust optimization approach using heuristics in conjunction with a lower bounding procedure for the subproblems. de Rosa et al [26] presented the robust capacitated facility location problem to cope with uncertainty by dynamically assigning multilevel production allocations, locations, and capacity adjustments for uncertain parameter development over time.…”
Section: Scientific Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the duality relationships between (4),(5), (6) and (10), (11), (12), we formulate the robust counterpart model as follows: …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%