2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2866208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Observer-Based Dynamic Sliding Mode Controller for a Quadrotor UAV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The considered wind guest in this scenario results in f I ∞ = 1 and f o ∞ = 2. As shown in Table 2, the parameters β I in (25) and β o in (33), are designed to satisfy the stability conditions given in (26) and (36), respectively. The performance of the proposed tracking control strategy is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered wind guest in this scenario results in f I ∞ = 1 and f o ∞ = 2. As shown in Table 2, the parameters β I in (25) and β o in (33), are designed to satisfy the stability conditions given in (26) and (36), respectively. The performance of the proposed tracking control strategy is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust attitude stabilization controller is proposed, which consists of a nominal state-feedback controller and a robust compensator, for quadrotor systems under the influences of nonlinear and coupling dynamics, including parametric uncertainties, unmodeled uncertainties, and external disturbances [35]. Besides, in [36], by combining with SMC, a robust backstepping-based approach is investigated for position and attitude tracking of a quadrotor UAV subject to external disturbances and parameter uncertainties, associated with the presence of aerodynamic forces and possible wind force. Moreover, a hierarchical control strategy based on adaptive radial basis function neural networks (RBFNNs) and double-loop integral SMC is presented in [37] for the trajectory tracking of the quadrotor UAV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Compared with the neural networks (NN)-based observers [30]- [33], [50], [51] and the nonlinear ESO [59]- [62] requiring the multiple states information and complex nonlinear coefficients, the LESO employed in the control scheme is intuitively designed based on the state feedback, and the tuning operation is rather simple since linear observer parameters are utilized. (2) Rather than the nonlinear disturbances observers [45]- [49], [64]- [67] and other ESO [59]- [63] based on the position feedback, the 2 nd -order LESO with velocity feedback is developed. In practice, the velocity information is easily acquired, which is more accurate and reliable, especially for the multi-rotor UAVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the 2 nd -order LESO based on the velocity feedback is likely to be more practical than that with the position feedback. (3) Unlike the existing observers [59]- [67] including ESO based control methods with large observer gains being usually selected to reduce the bounded tracking errors, the proposed nonlinear control scheme improves the robustness by introducing the adaptive switching term based compensator to eliminate the observation errors, and the asymptotical tracking performance of the hexacopter UAV can be achieved. The requirement on the large observer gains is relaxed, and high gain behaviors can be avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%