2022
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbac029
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust nonparametric analysis of dynamic profits, prices and productivity: An application to French meat-processing firms

Abstract: Appropriately considering adjustment costs, this paper develops a robust nonparametric framework to analyse profits, prices and productivity in a dynamic context. Dynamic profit change is decomposed into a dynamic Bennet price indicator and a dynamic Bennet quantity indicator. The latter is decomposed into explanatory factors. It is shown to be a superlative indicator for the dynamic Luenberger indicator. The application focuses on 1,638 observations of French meat-processing firms for the years 2012–2019. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can alleviate the problem of sampling bias with a bootstrapping procedure (Simar & Wilson, 1998, 2020). However, as observed in the study of Ang and Kerstens (2023), such a procedure may be computationally intensive. Another route is the use of stochastic frontier analysis (Aigner et al, 1977; Meeusen & van Den Broeck, 1977), which may overcome such computational hurdles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can alleviate the problem of sampling bias with a bootstrapping procedure (Simar & Wilson, 1998, 2020). However, as observed in the study of Ang and Kerstens (2023), such a procedure may be computationally intensive. Another route is the use of stochastic frontier analysis (Aigner et al, 1977; Meeusen & van Den Broeck, 1977), which may overcome such computational hurdles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, BLHM $BLHM$ is shown as the sum of output growth, OC12(truepˆt+truepˆt+1)(boldyt+1boldyt) $OC\equiv \frac{1}{2}({\hat{{\bf{p}}}}_{t}+{\hat{{\bf{p}}}}_{t+1})\cdot ({{\bf{y}}}_{t+1}-{{\bf{y}}}_{t})$, and input decline, IC12(truewˆt+truewˆt+1)(boldxt+1boldxt) $IC\equiv -\frac{1}{2}({\hat{{\bf{w}}}}_{t}+{\hat{{\bf{w}}}}_{t+1})\cdot ({{\bf{x}}}_{t+1}-{{\bf{x}}}_{t})$, in which we decompose OC $OC$ and IC $IC$ separately. We closely follow the exposition of Ang and Kerstens (2023, pp. 26–29) in taking Laspeyres and Paasche perspectives for further decomposition.…”
Section: Decomposing the Luenberger‐hicks‐moorsteen‐approximating Ben...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a linear programming procedure in line with Aigner and Chu (1968), we approximate a dynamic directional distance function by a quadratic functional form. Following Ang and Kerstens (2023), we adapt the approximation of the static directional distance function (see, for example, Färe et al, 2005 and Ang & Kerstens, 2020) to the dynamic context. The shadow prices are determined by exploiting the dual relationship between the dynamic directional distance function and the dynamic profit function.…”
Section: Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%