2003
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690490715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust nonlinear model predictive control of batch processes

Abstract: NMPC explicitly addresses constraints and nonlinearities during

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
160
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
160
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In seeded crystallisation, ideally the supersaturation is maintained at the desired constant value throughout the entire batch by the application of properly designed control algorithms (Chung et al, 1999;Nagy and Braatz, 2003;Xie et al, 2001;Zhang and Rohani, 2003;Simon et al, 2009a). Supersaturation, generated by cooling, can be consumed by the growth of seeds added, and hence, it can be kept relatively low throughout the batch if enough seeds are loaded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In seeded crystallisation, ideally the supersaturation is maintained at the desired constant value throughout the entire batch by the application of properly designed control algorithms (Chung et al, 1999;Nagy and Braatz, 2003;Xie et al, 2001;Zhang and Rohani, 2003;Simon et al, 2009a). Supersaturation, generated by cooling, can be consumed by the growth of seeds added, and hence, it can be kept relatively low throughout the batch if enough seeds are loaded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The state estimations that use a time-varying full matrix Q lead to a better performance than the constant diagonal matrix, as it is shown in Figure 1. Although the linearized approach performance has not been as good as the Monte Carlo approach performance, it can be improved whether the parameter covariance matrix C p is available from parameter estimation [5]. Besides, the CEKF has presented the best performance for the state estimation for all the tuning techniques.…”
Section: Systematic Tuning Approaches For Ekf and Cekfsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…In [3,4], two systematic approaches are used to calculate Q from the parametric model uncertainties and the accuracy of this techniques are compared favorably with the traditional methods of trial-and-error tuning of EKF. Moreover, the NMPC algorithm proposed by [5] takes parameter uncertainty in account in the state estimation through these systematic approaches. Furthermore, the use of data preprocessing and dynamic data reconciliation techniques can considerably reduce the inaccuracy of process data due to measurement errors, improving the overall performance of the MPC when the data is first reconciled prior to being fed to the controller [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Note that the above approach leads to a time-varying, full covariance matrix, which has been shown to provide better estimation performance for batch processes than the classically used constant, diagonal ( Valapil and Georgakis, 2000;Nagy and Braatz, 2003).…”
Section: State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 43%