2017
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2016.2620965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Multilinear Tensor Rank Estimation Using Higher Order Singular Value Decomposition and Information Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, this low-rank representation should be rich enough to include all dimensions of the original HI tensor that contain relevant information. Therefore, although the literature presents many rank estimation strategies (see [39] and references therein), in this work we exploit the rank bounds discussed in Section II-E to approximate the "useful rank" of a tensor by the number of the largest singular values of their matricized versions required to represent most of the tensor energy.…”
Section: F Estimating Tensor Ranksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, this low-rank representation should be rich enough to include all dimensions of the original HI tensor that contain relevant information. Therefore, although the literature presents many rank estimation strategies (see [39] and references therein), in this work we exploit the rank bounds discussed in Section II-E to approximate the "useful rank" of a tensor by the number of the largest singular values of their matricized versions required to represent most of the tensor energy.…”
Section: F Estimating Tensor Ranksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , N. Rank of the Tucker decompositions can be determined using information criteria [227], or through the number of dominant eigenvalues when an approximation accuracy of the decomposition or a noise level is given (see Algorithm 8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the beamformed noise N in (25) follows an i.i.d. Gaussian distribution and is independent of Y, we adopt a minimum description length (MDL) method to estimate the number of signal path components L [32], [33].…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%