2021
DOI: 10.1177/10775463211017721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust multi-steps input command for liquid sloshing control

Abstract: A robust input command based on multiple steps for eliminating the residual vibrations of a multimode linear system is proposed. Only the system resonant frequencies are needed to determine the step magnitudes in the shaped command. The command duration is selectable to help in designing an optimum command that compensates between the reduction in the transient vibration, the enhancement in the command robustness, and the increase in the total maneuver time. The induced transient and residual sloshing oscillat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (10), 𝑤 1 , 𝑤 2 and 𝑤 3 are the weighting coefficients as per determined by the system's designer. The FOPID controller parameters i.e.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (10), 𝑤 1 , 𝑤 2 and 𝑤 3 are the weighting coefficients as per determined by the system's designer. The FOPID controller parameters i.e.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the command shaping techniques which generates a command from the convolution between the reference and a multi-sine wave function [9]. Another feed-forward control was introduced by Alshaya and Alshayji [10] which proposed an equidistant multistep input command for eliminating the liquid slosh. They have modeled the liquid sloshing based on finite element method (FEM) to numerically predict the elevation of the free-surface liquid level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given θ 3 , we assume a specific value of the final impulse magnitude A 3 (0 < A 3 < 1), and find A 1 , A 2 , t 2 that satisfy Eqs ( 8)- (10). Then, we vary the value of A 3 , and find A 1 , A 2 , t 2 that satisfy Eqs ( 8)-( 10), repeatedly.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we obtain an SD shaper for the case when T s is between 1 and 1.5. Even when T s is between 1 and 1.5, an input shaper with three impulses can be obtained from constraints Eqs ( 8)- (10). However, to maximize 5% insensitivity, we obtain an SD shaper with four impulses as displayed in Fig 3 by adding derivative constraints.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation