2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2365835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Multi-Period OPF With Storage and Renewables

Abstract: Renewable energy sources and energy storage systems present specific challenges to the traditional optimal power flow (OPF) paradigm. First, storage devices require the OPF to model charge/discharge dynamics and the supply of generated power at a later time. Second, renewable energy sources necessitate that the OPF solution accounts for the control of conventional power generators in response to errors of renewable power forecast, which are significantly larger than the traditional load forecast errors. This p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(95 reference statements)
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, it is possible to compare their results with the ones presented here, without considering the BESS aging costs. In this particular case, the findings of the present papers agree with the ones in [11], as well as showing better cost improvements than the ones found in [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In any case, it is possible to compare their results with the ones presented here, without considering the BESS aging costs. In this particular case, the findings of the present papers agree with the ones in [11], as well as showing better cost improvements than the ones found in [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The cost results of the optimization are compared with the existing literature, and in particular with papers which assess the cost impact of ESSs using MPOPF methods and quadratic cost functions for balancing generation [8,11]. The resulting cost reduction obtained in [11] ranges between 40% and 50%, with respect to the cost of the system without ESS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations