2022
DOI: 10.1002/qre.3199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust monitoring of multivariate processes with short‐ranged serial data correlation

Abstract: Control charts are commonly used in practice for detecting distributional shifts of sequential processes. Traditional statistical process control (SPC) charts are based on the assumptions that process observations are independent and identically distributed and follow a parametric distribution when the process is in‐control (IC). In practice, these assumptions are rarely valid, and it has been well demonstrated that these traditional control charts are unreliable to use when their model assumptions are invalid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, model residuals are obtained, which are the differences between the model predicted values and the actual values of the monitoring variable. Some work has been done using multiple regression to detrend monitoring variables prior to monitoring. , It is also common to monitor the residuals from ML or time series models, but these methods do not distinguish between explanatory and monitoring variables in the process. Instead, they predict each monitoring variable using previous values or other process variables as predictors. Separating process variables into “explanatory” or “monitoring” reduces the number of variables being monitored directly and leads to a more straightforward interpretation of any OC signals as attributable to changes in the process that are not predicted by the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, model residuals are obtained, which are the differences between the model predicted values and the actual values of the monitoring variable. Some work has been done using multiple regression to detrend monitoring variables prior to monitoring. , It is also common to monitor the residuals from ML or time series models, but these methods do not distinguish between explanatory and monitoring variables in the process. Instead, they predict each monitoring variable using previous values or other process variables as predictors. Separating process variables into “explanatory” or “monitoring” reduces the number of variables being monitored directly and leads to a more straightforward interpretation of any OC signals as attributable to changes in the process that are not predicted by the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, according to the simulation results, the performance of SS-CUSUM and DD-CUSUM control charts is better than traditional CUSUM charts. For more research on nonparametric multivariate control charts, we cite Koutras and Sofikitou, 30 Koutras and Triantafyllou, 31 Mahmood and Erem, 32 Xie and Qiu, 33 and Zhou and Qiu. 34 This study proposes a CUSUM control chart relying on bivariate exceedance statistics for observing the shifts in location parameters in bivariate manufacturing processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, according to the simulation results, the performance of SS‐CUSUM and DD‐CUSUM control charts is better than traditional CUSUM charts. For more research on nonparametric multivariate control charts, we cite Koutras and Sofikitou, 30 Koutras and Triantafyllou, 31 Mahmood and Erem, 32 Xie and Qiu, 33 and Zhou and Qiu 34 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%