Robust MDSDO for Co-Design of Stochastic Dynamic Systems

Abstract

Optimization of dynamic engineering systems generally requires problem formulations that account for the coupling between embodiment design and control system design simultaneously. Such formulations are commonly known as combined optimal design and control (co-design) problems, and their application to deterministic systems is well established in the literature through a variety of methods. However, an issue that has not been addressed in the co-design literature is the impact of the inherent uncertainties within a dynamic system on its integrated design solution. Accounting for these uncertainties transforms the standard, deterministic co-design problem into a stochastic one, thus requiring appropriate stochastic optimization approaches for its solution. This paper serves as the starting point for research on stochastic co-design problems by proposing and solving a novel problem formulation based on robust design optimization (RDO) principles. Specifically, a co-design method known as multidisciplinary dynamic system design optimization (MDSDO) is used as the basis for an RDO problem formulation and implementation. The robust objective and inequality constraints are computed per usual as functions of their first-order-approximated means and variances, whereas analysis-based equality constraints are evaluated deterministically at the means of the random decision variables. The proposed stochastic co-design problem formulation is then implemented for two case studies, with the results indicating the importance of the robust approach on the integrated design solutions and performance measures.

South African Creditors May Wield the Gibbs Rule to Confront an Italian Pre-Insolvency Statutory Restructuring Composition

“…Lioni pleaded that Alexander & Co's action was not justified. Counsel for Alexander & Co argued: 'There was no case on the books to show a debtor who had not obtained his discharge could set up his insolvency in a foreign country as a defence to a suit in this colony', 148 and counsel relied on Frith & others v Wollaston, 149 where the Court of Exchequer in England had held that the insolvency legislation of the Cape of Good Hope only suspended the creditor's remedy but did not discharge the debt. Counsel for Lioni argued, among other things, that the 'discharge in Griqualand West of the insolvent would bar the creditor from suing for the debt here', 150 and counsel cited Burge.…”

Investigations Into Uncertain Control Co-Design Implementations for Stochastic in Expectation and Worst-Case Robust

“…As an example, consider a system in which uncertainties stem from plant optimization variables. While it is possible to change the plant design in response to uncertainties in order to achieve reliability or robustness (using methods based on reliability-based CCD [25,39] or robust CCD [40], respectively), it might be more cost-effective to leverage the control effort, including its limits, to achieve such criteria. Therefore, OLMC may be more suitable for early-stage design, where plant and control spaces are explored for performance optimality, as well as reliability or robustness.…”

“…The solution to a UCCD problem might become practically infeasible when simple bounds do not represent the true decision space in the presence of uncertainties [40,47]. To illustrate this further, consider a plant optimization variable p p that is bounded p p min ≤ p ≤ p p max .…”

Co-design and co-simulation for engineering systems: insights from the Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Game

“…Technical co-design in literature refers to simultaneous decision-making across traditionally sequential disciplines enabled by a shared model (i.e., variables, objectives and constraints) as a type of multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO; Allison, Guo & Han 2014;Azad & Alexander-Ramos 2020). Tighter coupling between decisions allows knowledge in one domain to more directly influence another without unnecessary constraints or delay from multiple iterations, resulting in a more desirable solution.…”