2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.10360
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust marginalization of baryonic effects for cosmological inference at the field level

Abstract: We train neural networks to perform likelihood-free inference from (25 h −1 Mpc) 2 2D maps containing the total mass surface density from thousands of hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. We show that the networks can extract information beyond one-point functions and power spectra from all resolved scales ( 100 h −1 kpc) while performing a robust marginalization over baryonic physics at the field level: the model can infer the value of Ωm(±4%) and σ8(±2.5%) from simulations completely different to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could use (3.15) as the likelihood for the observed map of galaxies (suitably generalized to redshift space [101]) and solve the high-dimensional minimization problem by brute force. Of course, good approximate methods exist for these types of problems (using machine learning [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]) and this approach is potentially the best way to perform a map-level analysis in practice. However, as our interest is in understanding the nature of the cosmic information in the maps, we will take the following analytic approach: we will first guess a model of the initial Gaussian map, δguess ( x), and find the maximum likelihood values of the parameters b n and f eq NL for the observed map, δ obs g ( x), while holding δguess ( x) fixed.…”
Section: With Cosmic Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One could use (3.15) as the likelihood for the observed map of galaxies (suitably generalized to redshift space [101]) and solve the high-dimensional minimization problem by brute force. Of course, good approximate methods exist for these types of problems (using machine learning [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]) and this approach is potentially the best way to perform a map-level analysis in practice. However, as our interest is in understanding the nature of the cosmic information in the maps, we will take the following analytic approach: we will first guess a model of the initial Gaussian map, δguess ( x), and find the maximum likelihood values of the parameters b n and f eq NL for the observed map, δ obs g ( x), while holding δguess ( x) fixed.…”
Section: With Cosmic Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have been using field-level likelihoods of the dark matter, halos and galaxies in order to test our modeling beyond the predictions of individual correlation functions [47][48][49][50][51]. In parallel, there is a large effort to apply "simulation-based inference" (made feasible by the application of machine learning) to cosmological data analysis [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. By forward modeling the cosmological maps, these approaches try to sample realizations of the initial conditions (and the cosmological parameters) and find those that best reproduce the observed maps of the late universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another avenue is to use machine learning techniques, e.g. neural networks, to find an approximation to the optimal estimator (Ravanbakhsh et al 2017;Schmelzle et al 2017;Gupta et al 2018;Ribli et al 2019;Fluri et al 2019;Ntampaka et al 2019;Hassan et al 2020;Zorrilla Matilla et al 2020;Villaescusa-Navarro et al 2021a;Lu et al 2021). Recent works have shown that even for fields that are very contaminated by astrophysical effects, it is possible to extract cosmological information from small scales (Villaescusa-Navarro et al 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%

Cosmology with one galaxy?

Villaescusa-Navarro,
Ding,
Genel
et al. 2022
Preprint
Self Cite
“…A useful meta-sample comes from the CAMELS project (Villaescusa- Navarro et al 2021cNavarro et al , 2022a, a suite of 2, 000 magneto-hydrodynamic simulations with varying initial conditions, cosmological and baryonic parameters, and two different subgrid physics models, designed with machine learning applications in mind (e.g. Villaescusa- Navarro et al 2021b). The CAMELS boxes are however small (25 Mpc/ℎ in side length), increasing sample variance.…”
Section: Simulations and Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%