2014
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2013.0117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust local stereo matching under varying radiometric conditions

Abstract: The authors present a local stereo matching algorithm whose performance is insensitive to changes in radiometric conditions between the input images. First, a prior on the disparities is built by combining the DAISY descriptor and Census filtering. Then, a Census-based cost aggregation with a self-adaptive window is performed. Finally, the maximum a-posteriori estimation is carried out to compute the disparity. The authors' algorithm is compared with both local and global stereo matching algorithms (NLCA, ELAS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research towards the use of a maximum a posteriori estimation [24] based stereo matching to compute the disparity of the pixels in different radiometric changes was also presented. Initially, a prior on the disparities of a few pixels is built.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research towards the use of a maximum a posteriori estimation [24] based stereo matching to compute the disparity of the pixels in different radiometric changes was also presented. Initially, a prior on the disparities of a few pixels is built.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of error values of disparity maps generated by the proposed method with other methods (different illumination conditions)[24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive simulations of test cases indicate that the wrong depth in occluded regions frequently appears as a large depth difference between neighboring pixels. To identify this condition, the x coordinate of the nearest pixel within a specific detection range (e.g., 8 pixels) with reliable depth is obtained as x nr if it exists, and then (9) is used to determine the reliability considering local occlusion (9) where T ld is a chosen threshold value for denoting a large depth difference between two nearby pixels, which is assumed to rarely appear in natural scenes. Fig.…”
Section: ) Minimum Cost Ambiguity Problem In Low-texture Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with global methods, local methods are often less time-consuming. However, their computational efficiency usually comes at the expense of reduced matching accuracy and increased sensitivity to noise [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%